| Felixstowe B | 31/10/23 | Manningtree C |
1 | Hemsworth, Gary | 1600 | ½ - ½ | Welsh, David | 1491 |
2 | Weidman, Mark J | 1589 | 1 - 0 | Ellingham, M | 1200 |
3 | Lewis, Alan J | 1525 | 1 - 0 | Orr, Kenzie | 1250 |
4 | Robertson, David | 1393 | 1 - 0 | Nowers, Mark | 1200 |
| | | 3½ - ½ | | |
|
There may only be one F in Felixstowe, but they have two venues, so the evening didn´t get off to a very good start when we
all turned up at the Seafarers to find no sign of the opposition. Attempts to phone their captain failed as his battery had
died, but we eventually got a call from another of their team to inform us that Felixstowe B play at The Dooley Inn, so it was
all back to the cars and a three minute drive out of the docks. In fairness to Felixstowe they did send out an email at the
start of the season telling us this, but they might like to consider updating their web site with this information rather
than rely on our team captain´s memory. We arrived at Dooley´s to find that Felixstowe had assembled their full
nominated squad, something they had not done in any of their three previous matches, which explains why they have only gained
one point from twelve boards, so an expected easier ride proved to be the exact opposite.
It has been said before, but Dooley´s is not the ideal venue for a chess match, situated as it is in a small connecting
room off the main dining area without a door and therefore subjected to the muted tones of music and TV. And even less ideal
as the music is generally awful. But at least there weren´t many punters in, so we were spared the additional noise of
a restaurant full of diners and children, although that will no doubt change in the run up to Christmas. Thankfully we have
no matches against Felixstowe B during that period.
Our two new comers to league chess tonight, Kenzie and Mark, were both quite impressive at the start, deliberating carefully,
taking their time and making sensible moves - well most of the time anyway. Kenzie played the exchange variation of the
French, which proceeded into a very lively game after Kenzie had castled long into a half open b-file. His opponent seemed
reluctant to attack down that avenue and all the action took place in the centre and on the king´s side. As the pieces
came off there wasn´t a great deal between the two, but then a disastrous miscalculation changed all that and we were
1-0 down.
Mark faced a King´s Gambit, which he declined, which may have confused his opponent, who shortly after lost a knight.
Mark was comfortably on top when he suffered a moment of blindness and placed a bishop en-prise to deliver a check. While
it would not have been a total disaster, but merely restoring material balance with a better position, Mark was lucky that
his opponent only realised the bishop was en-prise the moment after he moved his king out of check. A few moves later and
Mark had an overwhelming advantage, but instead of delivering the fatal blow, Mark decided to entice the enemy king into
the open by unequivocally returning the piece. It wasn´t a good decision, but he still had a winning position. But
as we all know, winning positions are not always won.
Martin faced a QGD in which his opponent failed to castle and launched a king´s side attack with an early h4. It was
a long time before anything more than a pair of pawns had been exchanged, and the board was looking decidedly crowded,
although it was Martin that was on the back foot. He put up stubborn resistance, but his opponent´s dominance proved
decisive in the end.
David played the somewhat unorthodox c4 to his opponent´s Sicilian, always a useful tactic for taking someone out of
their prepared lines. A strategic battle for control of the centre followed, and while his opponent had managed to place a
knight in the hole on d4, he then quickly swapped it off as David pressed on with a king´s side attack. His opponent defended
well, and with time running low for both players a draw was agreed.
So Felixstowe B scored three and a half times more ´over the board´ points in this one match than they have in their last
three. We didn´t expect that.
|
|